• Sarkar K, Chahine GL, Duraiswami R 1996, "Numerical Simulation of Separated Cavitation Behind a Sphere" ASME Fluids Engineering Division, FED-236, 479-484

    A model has been developed to simulate cavitation on a blunt body moving through water. The model is implemented into a mrmerica. l code using a coupled vortex element/boundary element method that solves the poteatial flow around the cavitating body. The code is applied io a solid sphere moving through the liquid.

  • Sarkar K, Duraiswami R, Chahine GL 1995, "Three-Dimensional Numerical Simulation of Bubble-Vortical Flow Interaction" ASME Fluids Engineering Division, FED-210, 135-144

  • O'Hern TJ, Torczynski JR, Ceccio SL, Tassin AL, Chahine GL, Duraiswami R, Sarkar K 1995, "Development of an electrical impedance tomography system for an air-water vertical bubble column" ASME Forum on Measurement Techniques in Multiphase Flows, SAND--95-1992C, CONF-951135--17

    Because the components of a multiphase flow often exhibit different electrical properties, a variety of probes have been developed to study such flows by measuring impedance in the region of interest. Researchers are now using electric fields to reconstruct the impedance distribution within a measurement volume via Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT). EIT systems employ voltage and current measurements on the boundary of a domain to create a representation of the impedance distribution within the domain. The development of the Sandia EIT system (S-EIT) is reviewed The construction of the projection acquisition system is discussed and two specific EIT inversion algorithms are detailed. The first reconstruction algorithm employs boundary element methods, and the second utilizes finite elements. The benefits and limitations of EIT systems are also discussed. Preliminary results are provided.

  • Sarkar K, Prosperetti A 1993, "Coherent and incoherent scattering from oceanic bubbles" The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93(4_Supplement), 2379

    In recent years, an effective medium theory has been applied to model the contribution of bubbles for low-frequency oceanic backscattering [Prosperetti et al. and Sarkar and Prosperetti, both submitted to J. Acoust. Soc. Am.] This approach differs from the more traditional one used to account for the effect of bubbles at higher frequencies, in which bubbles are treated as individual scatterers. Here, the relationship between these two apparently different approaches is clarified and a unified theory is presented. In this way, a better understanding of the rationale and limitations for the older theory is achieved. Applications to scattering and bubble counting are described.

  • Prosperetti A, Sarkar K 1992, "Enhanced backscattering from bubble cloud distributions on the ocean surface" The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91(4_Supplement), 2315

    It has been shown in earlier studies [Prosperetti, Lu, and Kim; Sarkar and Prosperetti, both submitted to J. Acoust. Soc. Am.] that bubble clouds produced by breaking waves at the ocean’s surface can explain the unexpectedly high backscattering levels observed experimentally by Chapman and Harris [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 34, 1592 (1962)] and others at low grazing angles. Gas volume fractions of the order of 1%, linear dimensions of the order of 1 m, and surface coverage of the order of 1% (the latter of which agrees with the experimentally measured values for 10 m/s winds) are sufficient to give an excellent match of the data as a function of frequency in the range 0.1–2 kHz and wind speeds from 5 to 25 m/s. In the previous work the clouds were treated as independent scatterers. In the present work the previous results are refined to include lowest order multiple scattering effects along the lines of Foldy [Phys. Rev. 67, 107 (1945)] and Biot [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 44, 1616 (1968)].